shadow

By John Thompson.

Valerie Strauss does a great service for students and schools by showcasing  the “small but growing number of teachers who are refusing to administer standardized tests that they think are harmful to their students and publicly explaining why they are doing so, sometimes at the risk of being fired.” Two outstanding Tulsa teachers have joined educators in Florida and Colorado, as well as students in opting out of standardized testing.

These first grade teachers, Miss Karen Hendren and Mrs. Nikki Jones were featured in a front page Tulsa World and the United Opt Out web site. They wrote an open letter to parents documenting the damage being done by testing and the new value-added evaluation system being implemented by the Tulsa schools under the guidance of the Gates Foundation.

Miss Hendren and Mrs. Jones explain how this obsession with testing “has robbed us of our ethics. They are robbing children of their educational liberties.” Our poorest kids are falling further behind because they are being robbed of reading instruction. By Hendren’s and Jones’ estimate, their students lose 288 hours or 72 days of school to testing!

They inventory the logistics of administering five sets of first grade tests, as classes are prepared for high-stakes third grade reading tests. More importantly, they described the brutality of the process.

Miss Hendren and Mrs. Jones recount the strengths of four students who are victims of the testing mania. One pulls his hair, two cry, one throws his chair, and the fourth, who could be categorized as gifted and talented, is dismayed that his scores are low, despite his mastery of so many subjects. Particularly interesting was the way that “adaptive” testing, which is supposed to be a more constructive, individualized assessment, inevitably results in students reaching their failure level, often prompting discouragement or, even, despair.

Since first graders are too young for high-stakes achievement tests for evaluating individual teachers, Tulsa relies on high-stakes student survey data. So, teachers can be sanctioned by the answers to questions such as, “Are you sleepy at school?”

Still, the abuse of teachers isn’t as bad as a regime that makes children “pee their pants.”

Tulsa has an otherwise excellent superintendent, Keith Ballard, who has opposed state level testing abuses. He has invested in high-quality early education and full-service community schools.  Ballard also deserves credit for investing in the socio-emotional. I doubt he would be perpetuating this bubble-in outrage if he had a choice. But Tulsa accepted the Gates Foundation’s grant money. So, Ballard is threatening the teachers’ jobs.

It is inconceivable that Ballard now feels comfortable with this part of the bargain he made – because he accepted corporate reformers’ money, he’s trapping into a system that drive a Lead teacher and professional development contributor, like Hendren, to take such a professional risk. This April, NPR’s Claudio Sanchez and Cory Turner reported on Jones, whose “firm but gentle” manner demonstrates how “play should be the beating heart of a child’s preschool experience.” NPR said that she “arrives each morning brimming with ideas and strategies rooted in research and good pedagogy. Indeed, what looks like an art project with acorns, pine cones, glass beads and a film projector is also a stealth math lesson. Jones says her kids love to count, add and subtract with little or no direct instruction.”

Fortunately, the president of the Tulsa Classroom Teachers Association and a member of the National Education Association board of directors, is showing courageous leadership. Patti Ferguson-Palmer  wrote the following “Open Letter of Support for Two Brave Teachers” on Tuesday morning:

Nikki Coates-Jones and Karen Hendren, are speaking out on a national level against toxic testing and ‘accountability’ measures which take away precious instructional time from our classrooms. They are passionate about teaching and are deeply committed to their own students and to all students whose experiences in school have become dry and joyless due to constant test preparation and data mining.

These ladies are widely recognized as highly effective teachers and these highly-effective teachers have had enough. They are refusing to administer the MAP test and student surveys to their first-graders. They are part of the United Opt-Out movement and they are courageously speaking on behalf of students and teachers who have suffered in silence for too long.

I give them my full support and encouragement and I will be with them as they take this path.

What do you think? Is it time to expand the Opt Out movement? We can all support those who Opt Out, can’t we?

Photo by Eden, Janine and Jim, used with Creative Commons license.

Author

Anthony Cody

Anthony Cody worked in the high poverty schools of Oakland, California, for 24 years, 18 of them as a middle school science teacher. He was one of the organizers of the Save Our Schools March in Washington, DC in 2011 and he is a founding member of The Network for Public Education. A graduate of UC Berkeley and San Jose State University, he now lives in Mendocino County, California.

Comments

  1. readingdoc    

    Thank you for supporting these Tulsa teachers! However, I disagree with your assessment of Dr. Ballard. Here in Oklahoma, where we fought hard to remove Common Core from state law, a law that in fact prohibits the use of Common Core, Dr. Ballard announced publicly in August that his district would continue to use Common Core, leading other school districts to follow suit in direct violation of state law. I don’t see this or his insinuations about the qualifications of these two teachers as a role model for Tulsa students.

    1. John Thompson    

      I hadn’t known Ballard was going ahead on Common Core. If he’s defying the law and the Republican majority, then he’s really on thin ice. Why would he do such a risky thing at the end of his career?

      Oh, yeah, he answers to Gates above all.

  2. howardat58    

    The Common Core math is more or less fine, but the testing is monumentally stupid, and, from some of the PARCC samples, wrong (educationally, not mathematically).
    I fully support these two, I have nothing to lose but will happily contribute to a fighting fund.

  3. Susan Bowles    

    These teachers have my support. They have chosen to put their students before themselves. At the risk of losing their jobs, their are letting people have a peek into the insane asylum that education has become.

  4. howardat58    

    I would support anyone who made a stand against a testing program where no-one at all was allowed to see the tests beforehand, and it appears that no-one will get to see them after the tests have been taken. If this is correct it is unbelievably evil, and worthy of a dictatorship. The idea that test questions for grade 3 should be covered by intellectual property rules is laughable. Gives a new slant to the word “intellectual”.

  5. Sandy Stenoff    

    Yes, the opt out movement needs to grow. Parents have taken hits from reformers as going along with the status quo. We’ve been condescended to and accused of being afraid of accountability; of thinking our kids are smarter than they actually are.

    When the school board in Lee County rescinded their vote to opt their district out of standardized tests, it was from the threats of losing funding and of endangering graduation for seniors. The statutes already provided for alternative assessments, by which the seniors could have earned their diplomas. As for the possibility of losing funding, they probably would have come out ahead as they would not have absorbed the cost of that testing, which is not sufficiently funded by the state.

    What NO ONE has yet been able to say, is that we should keep offering up our children to the testing gods like compliant little sheep, because teachers and students actually learn anything from testing. Because they can’t. They have not been able to demonstrate how students and teachers benefit from high stakes testing. This is about not trusting teachers to teach our children. Well, parents overwhelmingly are satisfied with their children’s teachers. We trust our teachers. And the accountability we seek is from those elected to serve US.

    Conversations are happening across the country between parents and school boards, between parents and legislators, because of the fast growing opt out movement.

    Many parents are unaware that a failing score harms a child immediately AND long into the future. I have no fear about this testing season for my children. They have already been opted out and their teachers have been freed from teaching them to the test. All children should be so lucky. The thing is, they CAN be.

    Ask yourself – What if they schedule the tests, and no one shows up?

Leave a Reply