shadow

By Anthony Cody.

Many of us are in a state of deep frustration over the strong possibility that Bernie Sanders will not be the Democratic Party’s nominee in the presidential race this fall. Circumstances may yet occur to upset the presumptions that are now being made, so I think it is legitimate to wait until the convention in Philadelphia to see who the actual nominee will be. But the feelings of frustration have some important roots, and should not be discarded lightly, because they point the way forward.

As Chris Hedges has suggested, we are living in a shadow sort of pseudo-democracy, where our political choices are constrained by what we are told is possible, and what is impossible. Hope is discouraged. Participation is futile.

In spite of the fact that the US has the wealthiest, most productive economy in the world, we have been told that there is not enough money to pay for:

  • Health care for all
  • Higher education for all
  • Adequate funding for public schools

We are told that public schools are so broken that further investment in them is unwarranted, and money should be funneled into a parallel system of supposedly innovative, largely non-union charter schools, which intensify patterns of segregation and inequity.

We are told fracking can be made safe for the environment, even as we see groundwater polluted coast to coast.

We have been told that businesses cannot afford to pay workers a living wage, even as they swim in profits.

We have been told that public sector jobs are somehow inherently wasteful, while corporations like Walmart are subsidized by having their low wage employees enroll in government assistance to feed their families. Meanwhile our nation’s infrastructure crumbles around us.

We have been told to accept for-profit prisons, though the very idea of making money from incarcerating people should be repugnant.

We have been told that for a politician to be elected, he or she must embrace and defend every act carried out by the Israeli government, and deny any legitimacy to Palestinian concerns.

We have been told that systemic racism is on the way out when huge inequities remain stronger than ever, and little is being done to dismantle them.

We have been told that corporate-inspired trade deals like the TPP are needed to keep the US “competitive,” all the while we are kept in the dark about provisions that favor privatization and impinge on democracy all over the world.

These messages come from Democrats and Republicans alike. The Republicans are more extreme, to be sure. But look at Chicago, where Democrat Rahm Emanuel has closed down scores of schools and threatens to leave the schools there a shambles.

Look at the last eight years of federal policy under President Obama and Secretary Duncan. No Republicans were needed for our schools and students to suffer tremendous damage.

The frustration Sanders supporters feel is that through his candidacy, we got a glimpse of an alternative reality, within our grasp as a nation.

Although we were told that all politicians must pursue corporate cash because that is what it takes to get elected, Sanders proved that was not so.

Although voters were told not to bother, that Sanders had lost, they still showed up by the millions to support real change.

We have been told to “accept the math” that makes it impossible for Sanders to be the Democratic nominee. We have also been told to accept the math that says there is not enough money to pay for health care, education and jobs. But Sanders has showed this to be an illusion, and while he may not overcome the math regarding convention delegates, we must be clear that his math regarding wealth inequities is solid: there is plenty of money to support human needs and our environment. The fight for these things will continue, whether or not he is the nominee.

My knowledge of history will not allow me to be cavalier about the possibility of a Trump presidency. When he says he will create a special sort of police force to round up millions of immigrants, I have to take him at his word. When his racism unleashes the pent up fears and aggression of whites, this is a truly dangerous thing. We cannot stand by and allow Trump to be elected.

But the movement to stop Trump cannot be all about electing someone who is not actually ready to fight for the world that Sanders showed us is possible. We need to build an independent movement that not only defeats Trump, but rises beyond that minimal goal to push for genuine democracy, economic, environmental and social justice.

In 2011, education activists went to Washington, DC, by the thousands with the Save Our Schools March to protest the policies of the Obama administration. We will be back again a month from now, to once again insist that schools and students not be sold out.

The Network for Public Education is also pressing the Democratic Party to take a strong stand in their platform in support of real change in public education and against high stakes testing and privatization. Please sign on here to support this effort.

We need to continue to push for the reality Sanders has allowed us to glimpse – a reality in which not all politicians are bought off, where the vast wealth of our nation can be redirected towards people’s needs, where the future of the environment need not be sacrificed for the sake of greed. Even though I will vote for whomever the Democratic nominee will be, I will not consider that adequate as an expression of my responsibility as a citizen and an educator. The struggle continues. I will be with Bernie Sanders as long as he keeps ringing that bell.

What do you think?

Featured photo by Alex Garland.  Used with permission, all rights reserved.

Author

Anthony Cody

Anthony Cody worked in the high poverty schools of Oakland, California, for 24 years, 18 of them as a middle school science teacher. He was one of the organizers of the Save Our Schools March in Washington, DC in 2011 and he is a founding member of The Network for Public Education. A graduate of UC Berkeley and San Jose State University, he now lives in Mendocino County, California.

Comments

  1. Arthur Camins    

    Anthony,
    The importance of Sanders candidacy was always the potential to incite, support, and galvanize a movement for racial, economic, social and environmental justice. It was its potential to rekindle lost hope for something better. That is true whether or not he was elected, since the president does not act alone. Whether that potential is realized remains to be seen. It is important to recognize that movements do not thrive when despots and authoritarians are empowered or when they are able to stir hatred. None of the big progressive changes in the US happened because of presidential good will and courage or corporate largesse. They happened because folks in power wanted to hold off even more progressive change. Centrist democrats are not friends of working people. Their abandonment of the needs of working people and of integration and their support for deregulation exacerbated divisiveness and white working class resentment. However, that is still not equal to Trump or the Republican party. Voting for Clinton is not about choosing between the lesser of two evils. It is about preventing the election of an ignorant, demagogic, xenophobic, racist, who will make building a progressive movement harder. So, as I see it standing aside is not a viable option. It is not an acceptance of the status quo or moral abdication. It’s a strategic move. Building a multi-racial progressive movement is still what needs to be done.

    Arthur
    http://www.arthurcamins.com

  2. Dale Lidicker    

    We have to be in it for the long haul. Progressives will need to be very organized and tenacious. Thankfully, Bernie gave his best to begin a movement. Hopefully, it will resemble the proverbial snowball rolling downhill…

  3. Amanda    

    Thank you for this post Anthony. You brought up many good points, especially about businesses being subsidized by government social programs when wages are too low, etc. I hadn’t formulated that language on my own, and I appreciate having it now.

  4. Katy    

    Thank you, Anthony Cody.
    Bernie Sanders has morals. He is a hero.

  5. tultican    

    Somehow the message that Trump is to be so feared that I must vote for any tool the Democratic party put up does not seem right. I think people should vote for who they think would be a better president. At the moment, I plan to vote for Jill Stein. If Trump wins, we will deal with it. At least I won’t be giving support to a corrupted Democratic party.

  6. Linda    

    I agree with the above. Fear is not a reason to do something you don’t like. I want to vote for what I like. Moreover, the election was rigged in Arizona and California and Brooklyn and many other places. The thought of Trump is scary, but we can’t give in to fear. Better to confront it than to cower and obey the destroyers of progress.

  7. Arthur Camins    

    Choosing to vote for Clinton rather than either abstaining or voting for a candidate with no chance of winning is not at this moment in history acquiescence to fear. It does not mean acceptance of the status quo, unless we stop working to build a movement for social, racial, economic and environmental justice. It is a strategic choice that recognizes that if Trump wins even the limited rights and freedoms we enjoy may disappear. The state of democracy in the US is not healthy, but it CAN get worse. That makes building a movement harder. It does mean that recognizing the direct threat to our Muslim and Mexican neighbors is great enough to not let feeling better about who vote for as an individual get in the way of what we must do together. Permitting Trump to be elected will sow more hatred, making incidents like this morning’s in Orlando more frequent. That will provide the justification for further repression. We cannot let that happen.

  8. Michael Paul Goldenberg    

    Anthony, this is excellent in every detail but one: I am not convinced that Trump will be worse than a corrupt, dishonest neoliberal/neoconservative hybrid with a PROVEN track record as a militarist murderer. I will not accept or vote for the she-wolf in the $12K Armani pantsuit no matter what. I will write in Bernie Sanders in November should he not be on the ballot. If the Democratic Party doesn’t come to its senses on its own, perhaps the FBI will force it to do so. #I’dRatherBern #StillNotWithHer

  9. Michael Paul Goldenberg    

    Arthur Camins wrote in part: “Permitting Trump to be elected will sow more hatred, making incidents like this morning’s in Orlando more frequent. That will provide the justification for further repression. We cannot let that happen.”

    Really? You think that there will be fewer incidents if Hillary Clinton is elected, a woman who got on board with GLBTQ rights only after other politicians did so publicly? She’s shown a deep commitment to exactly ONE minority group: the Bill & Hillary Clinton family. Any other “progressive” move she’s made has been late and with careful political calculation. I find exactly zero reason to believe that her ACTIONS foretell a activist presidency on her part in the defense of the downtrodden and discriminated against. Last time she had close to the power of the presidency, she helped several highly repressive and regressive policies and laws be enacted: welfare reform and mandatory sentencing. These have deeply and disproportionately hurt women, minorities, and the poor. That they voted for her in many cases simply reflects the effectiveness of her image, her hype, the media coronation of another neoliberal/neoconservative in defense of the 1%, the status quo, the oligarchy, etc. against the threat of a democratic socialist and (basically) independent outsider. Meanwhile, their hyping and constant coverage of Donald Trump helped that outsider take the GOP nod, quite possible to ensure that Hillary had an easy target to run against in November. Could she have beaten, say, John Kasich? We’ll won’t know this time around.

    In any event, there is zero substantive or logical evidence to support the notion that a Trump presidency will lead to more violence against the GLBTQ community than would a Clinton presidency. In the short run, neither would the election of Bernie Sanders. But one of those three has shown a lifelong willingness to go against the status quo and for the “little person.” And that’s not Trump or Clinton.

    On top of that, there’s a believable possibility that Clinton will be indicted before she gets a chance to face the nation at the polls in November. It would be fascinating (and wonderful) to see that happen before July, so that the Democratic Party gets a chance to look at Sanders without the polluting glare of Clinton’s star powerful spotlights. But regardless, I believe this election demands that people of conscience and good will cast their votes for Bernie Sanders. I will be doing so and urge others to follow suit.

Leave a Reply