shadow

By Sarah Lahm.

Wham, VAM, here comes a public airing of teacher evaluation data for all Minneapolis Public Schools teachers, just in time for the 2014 election. Sources tell me that Minneapolis’ largest newspaper, the StarTribune, will publish teacher evaluation information, based on SOEI (Standards of Effective Instruction) observations, student surveys, and value-added student test score data (VAM), on Sunday, November 2.

[Update, 4 pm Nov. 1: The report has now been posted.]

The newspaper is expected to publish a map of the city’s schools. Of course, this map will show that high poverty, high needs schools house the district’s lower performing teachers, and, probably, the district’s least-experienced teachers.

On Tuesday, November 4, Minneapolis voters will elect two new at-large school board candidates, in a race that has seen an incredible influx of outside money from such well-heeled proponents of education reform as Michael Bloomberg, who was an avid supporter of the public release of teacher evaluation data while mayor of New York City. The heightened political environment around our public school system, nationally and locally, means the release (without names) of teacher evaluation data will probably fan flames and push people farther apart from one another.

I would like to pierce through this a bit, by sharing my recent experience in a Minneapolis Public Schools classroom.

On October 30, I went to a “Pumpkin Math” party in my daughter’s kindergarten classroom (she goes to a Magnet school that is on the verge of qualifying for Title 1 funding). While there, I observed my daughter’s energetic young teacher moving about a mile a minute, working overtime to keep the twenty-seven five and six year olds in her class engaged, on topic, and safe.

This teacher had six spaces set out in her classroom, each with a large green sheet of paper, a large pumpkin, pencils, string, blocks, and a piece of paper for each child. She had obviously planned ahead and was as prepared as could be.

When her young students filed, or, rather, flew, jumped, bounced, wiggled, and sauntered, into the classroom, back from their time with a science teacher, the teacher’s carefully crafted plans were put to the test. Suddenly, the room seemed very crowded with the excited giggles and shouts of twenty-seven little voices.

The kindergarteners were supposed to measure the pumpkin in various ways, and even test one out in the classroom sink, to see if it could float. I sat at one of the six spaces with my own daughter, as well as three other little girls. Among the four, three native languages were represented: English, Spanish, and Somali.

The room buzzed with exuberance and enthusiasm, and it wasn’t long before the Pumpkin Math project lost favor with the students. The structured goals of the activity just could not compete with the energy of twenty-seven little bodies, on the day before Halloween.

Some kids literally could not sit still or follow directions. They wiggled, poked their neighbor, put the string that was to measure the width of the pumpkin around their own hands instead, and otherwise behaved like young children.

The teacher was amazing. She kept her cool. She moved on quickly when she sensed she was losing control of the class. She admonished those who were in danger of pushing the Pumpkin Math activity quickly downhill. She continually called on the students to stay focused and even pressed them to be silent a few times, which I viewed as an unfortunate necessity in such a crowded classroom.

Eventually, she had the whole class lined up in rows, dancing in unison to a Zumba video they were familiar with. In that moment, all twenty-seven acted as one, and seemed to revel in the movement and music. This teacher had an incredible amount of tricks up her sleeve, and has an incredible task in front of her: she must meet the needs of twenty-seven very different children for a full school day, five days a week. She has minimal classroom support, although parents have been told that the district is in the process of hiring a kindergarten aide.

What about any of this, I wonder, would show up in a rubric-based evaluation of her?

Author

Anthony Cody

Anthony Cody worked in the high poverty schools of Oakland, California, for 24 years, 18 of them as a middle school science teacher. He was one of the organizers of the Save Our Schools March in Washington, DC in 2011 and he is a founding member of The Network for Public Education. A graduate of UC Berkeley and San Jose State University, he now lives in Mendocino County, California.

Comments

  1. howardat58    

    I am finding out more and more about the bizarre American system. In England the year groups of kids from kindergarten to grade 5 have one teacher per group, who covers all the subject areas. Specialist science teacher for kindergarten – amazing.Kindergarten and primary school teachers are expected to have a good grip on everything, at the appropriate level. And national testing occurs at ages 7, 10 and 14 only. It works !!!!

  2. Julie Martin    

    I am a very good third grade teacher. I left an affluent school system that had excellent standardized test scores to work in an urban school district with a high ESL population because I thought it was the right thing to do. I get very good evaluation scores. However the test scores of my students are not always good. I had a principal who required that I use one third of my students’ reading time doing a computer program that I could see was not working. I had a parent tell me that her daughter “pooped glitter” and that since she was six feet four and weighed over 300 pounds she could make me treat her daughter like the princess she was. I currently have a student who was absent 24 times last year and tardy 31 times; he is on a pace to beat that this year. You want to start publishing my evaluation scores? That would be the last straw. I would go to a private school as I have seen others do in recent years. So the rich get “richer” with better teachers and the poor get poorer with young, inexperienced teachers. The public school system gets weaker. But isn’t that what the people who push these agendas, and will make money from them, really want?

  3. Alec    

    Turns out, after exhaustive correlated research, that high poverty school districts always have the lowest performing superintendents! It is high time to ask our investigative reporters at the Star Tribune why the superintendents of Edina, Minnetonka, and Eden Prairie are so much better than the superintendent of Minneapolis!

Leave a Reply