shadow

By Anthony Cody.

This week, Brian Williams is suffering from a public backlash because of the way a story about helicopters under fire in Iraq evolved over the years, leading to a version that inaccurately described the incident as one where his own life was in danger.

But this was not the first journalistic bungle by the popular NBC newscaster. During the second edition of the NBC News production of Education Nation in 2011, Brian Williams interviewed Melinda Gates. The Gates Foundation had underwritten the broadcast, but nonetheless, this was a journalistic endeavor. The Education Writers Association had awarded NBC News director Steve Capus with a first place award for a news series in 2010. When Williams interviewed Melinda Gates, however, he displayed none of the objectivity one might expect from a journalist. Here is what he said when he introduced her:

We’re also going to be joined by Melinda Gates, co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Gates Foundation, one of the sponsors of this event, and the largest single funder of education anywhere in the world. It’s their facts that we’re going to be referring to often to help along our conversation.

You could refer to our guest as the top funder of education in the world. A partner and sponsor of this year’s gathering. Also spending half a billion dollars to devise a way figure out what makes a great teacher, what makes them most effective. The estimates are the Gates Foundation has already spent, obviously a record for any education spending, spent or committed to spending five to seven billion dollars.

This gushing introduction, and particular his statement that the Gates Foundation’s “facts” were going to be guiding the discussion, represent a low point for American journalism.

The Education Writers Association recently declared that I was ineligible to compete for their prizes, even though I have won three awards, including a first place prize last year in the opinion category for my series on the Common Core. But there was not a peep from the EWA when Brian Williams declared his complete lack of objectivity. This was corporate owned media, underwritten by the biggest corporate philanthropy in the world. Business as usual.

Brian Williams’ latest misrepresentation has tripped him up because he ran afoul of the military media, which is highly sensitive to those who misrepresent or exaggerate the risks they endured in the field of battle. If only the education media protected the integrity of journalism with similar vigilance. Unfortunately, sponsored journalists and programming like Brian Williams and NBC News’ Education Nation are considered “independent” and “objective,” while writers like myself and Mercedes Schneider, who receive zero compensation for our work, are unworthy of such a description, because we write in defense of public education, and subject the corporate reform project to skeptical critique.

What do you think? How are our education journalists maintaining their integrity in an industry awash with corporate underwriting?

Image by Steve Rhodes, used with Creative Commons license.

Author

Anthony Cody

Anthony Cody worked in the high poverty schools of Oakland, California, for 24 years, 18 of them as a middle school science teacher. He was one of the organizers of the Save Our Schools March in Washington, DC in 2011 and he is a founding member of The Network for Public Education. A graduate of UC Berkeley and San Jose State University, he now lives in Mendocino County, California.

Comments

  1. ira shor    

    As Kurt Vonnegut used to say, Brian Williams joined all the dishonest folks “slurping at the Money River,” when he gave such a glowing undeserved and unobjective intro. to Melinda Gates. Big money buys big lies. Newsreporting and media are so important they cannot be left to their own professional ethics as far as corporate power is concerned.

  2. howardat58    

    The answer to your question is clearly “Not very successfully, and that is those who are trying”.
    I thought the largest funder of education was the state, perhaps gates is ahead now”.

  3. Lloyd Lofthouse    

    Forty-two years ago I graduated from college with a BA in journalism, and because of what I learned in that major, I stopped reading newspapers and trusting what I heard from the TV or radio news. The reason for this distrust was while earning that degree, I learned how misleading, biased, and flawed the private sector corporate media can be. I learned that a free media protected by the U.S. Bill of Rights doesn’t mean honesty and truth.

    I think most Americans are also slowly learning this painful truth—that the corporate media can’t be trusted anymore than the Chinese trust China’s state controlled media, Xinhua. But at least in China, almost every citizen, even the 80+ milllion CCP members—expect that when the state run Xinhua media reports on a hot-button issue, the opposite is usually the truth while in America, according to Gallup only 60% distrust the private sector corporate controlled media—90% of the mass media is owned and controlled by six global corporations and the 2nd largest in the world is Media Corp that’s is under the dictatorial thumb of known neoconservative Rupert Murdock.

    Gallup reports, “Prior to 2004, Americans placed more trust in mass media than they do now, with slim majorities saying they had a “great deal” or “fair amount” of trust. But over the course of former President George W. Bush’s re-election season, the level of trust fell significantly, from 54% in 2003 to 44% in 2004. Although trust levels rebounded to 50% in 2005, they have failed to reach a full majority since.”

    According to Gallup, trust now stands at 40%.

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/176042/trust-mass-media-returns-time-low.aspx

    But there was a time, when the federal government attempted to hold the private-sector, corporate mass media responsible for reporting a balanced story on important issues. It was called the Fairness Doctrine. It was a policy of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, that required the holders of broadcast licenses to both present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was, in the Commission’s view, honest, equitable and balanced.

    In 1969, In Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld (by a vote of 8-0) the constitutionality of the Fairness Doctrine in a case of an on-air personal attack, in response to challenges that the doctrine violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    But in 1985, under FCC Chairman Mark S. Fowler, a communications attorney who had served on Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign staff in 1976 and 1980, the FCC released a report stating that the doctrine hurt the public interest and violated free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.

    In June 1987, Congress attempted to preempt the FCC decision and codify the Fairness Doctrine, but the legislation was vetoed by President Ronald Reagan. Another attempt to revive the doctrine in 1991 was stopped when President George H.W. Bush threatened another veto.

    In other words—to Republicans and other extremist groups at both ends of the political spectrum—free speech includes the right to mislead, lie and be biased—-honesty was not important and these extremists still hold the upper hand with help from the likes of Bill Gates, the Koch brothers, The Walton family, and Eli Broad in addition to a few others.

  4. cassie    

    A) he DID tell the truth, the gates foundation ARE funding (forcing) what they want in education and deciding what THEY want… B) he not doing anything that he wasn’t told to do…
    drama makes for ratings. .. and as for drama, why now?… who cut him loose to deflect from the REAL problems… the gates are turning education into child abuse… the POS…oh sorry POTUS is destroying this country, but let’s not look at that, let’s waste the next 2 months looking at Brian Williams

    1. Lloyd Lofthouse    

      I don’t think we’ll spend two months looking at Brian Williams. Every day, there is a flood of information flowing through Diane’s Blog, the Education Bloggers Network and others like the BATS revealing more of this kind of corruption and fraud. In a week, the Williams post will be forgotten or a dim memory.

      We aren’t dealing with a mountain here. We are dealing with a huge mountain range. Brian Williams is only one of the foothills of the range but he still deserves his brief moment in infamy for the roll he plays in the fake reform movement.

  5. Mouse    

    Take Brian away, & I don’t watch your station anymore. Just look at all the liars that’s politicians, but that’s Ok!

  6. Gary Wolf    

    Shame on Jon Stewart for ignoring this. Williams is Stewart’s pal. And so got a pass. Shame on you, Mr. Stewart.

  7. Jim T    

    Hoping Jon Stewart steps to the plate and addresses this

Leave a Reply